An Analysis of the Historical and Theoretical Basis of Executive Powers Under the Nigerian and British Constitutions
Abstract
The exercise of executive powers has long dominated political discourse, tracing back to the evolution of organised societies. Across various systems of government, states have consistently grappled with the legality, legitimacy, and boundaries of executive authority, giving rise to foundational doctrines such as the separation of powers, the rule of law, and checks and balances in modern democratic governance. Nigeria currently operates a presidential system characterised by a constitutional separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial arms. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the overreach of executive authority, often manifesting in what many describe as executive recklessness. In contrast, the United Kingdom practices the Westminster parliamentary model, which is marked by a fusion of powers between the executive and legislature. Executive functions are discharged by the Prime Minister and Cabinet—who are themselves members of Parliament, creating blurred lines between law-making and execution. This structural fusion often enables a concentration of executive influence, with its extent largely shaped by the political dominance or assertiveness of the individual Prime Minister. This study undertook an analysis of the foundations and theoretical basis of executive powers in both Nigeria and the United Kingdom, focusing on their constitutional, statutory, political, and systemic mechanisms. Employing the doctrinal research methodology, the study relied on primary sources such as national constitutions and statutes, and secondary sources including textbooks, journal articles, and credible online materials. Findings showed that even under the presidential system where there is clear boundaries for executive authority, there are frequent instances of boundary- crossing—some constitutionally provided, while others are politically engineered. The study further observed that in both jurisdictions, exist
Keywords
References
More Articles from JOURNAL OF LAW AND GLOBAL POLICY
Author: Prof. Uwakwe Abugu, Olusola Sefeoluwa Ephraim-oluwanuga
Author: Chedochukwu I. Ugochukwu, Oluwatosin R. Adeniyi, Nkiruka A. Ani
Author: Somotun, Olufemi Olalekan, PhD, Nwobodo, Nnamdi Joseph, Esq, Avoseh, Francis, Pedepo, Elijah, Udeme Dapo, Udofia, Kenneth Thompson, Okon, Imoh Essien, Mhambe Celestine Tersoo
Author: Dr. Muhammad Ibrahim Bukar, AFHEA-UK, PhD
Author: Adebimpe Saheed Fagbemi, Ph.D., Muhammad Sani Idris Doctoral Candidate, Mudassir Nasir, Ph.D.
