Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

The supremacy of ARIMA over GARCH and ARFIMA models in modelling of Autocorrelated Kerosene-Type Jet Fuel Prices

Deebom Zorle Dum, Wobo Omezuruike Gideon

Abstract

In response to the increasing and unpredictable volatility in energy markets, particularly in the price of jet fuel, robust predictive models have become essential for effective decision-making and risk management. This study, therefore, offers an in-depth comparison of various models, including ARIMA, GARCH-family (such as GARCH, TGARCH, and EGARCH), and ARFIMA, for analyzing and predicting jet fuel prices like kerosene, by utilizing monthly data from February 1990 to June 2025. The methodology commences with time series plots and statistical descriptions to evaluate trends, normal distribution, and market volatility. Findings from unit root tests indicate that the raw data is non-stationary, which leads to the need for log transformations and differencing. Significant autocorrelation is identified through ACF and PACF plots and Ljung- Box Q-tests, highlighting the presence of time dependency. To investigate long memory properties, the Geweke and Porter-Hudak (GPH) test was applied, which reveals short memory behavior in returns, thus supporting the use of ARIMA and GARCH models. Among these, ARIMA (3,1,3) excels in AIC/BIC metrics, making it the best choice for forecasting. On the other hand, GARCH- family models offer a more profound understanding of volatility. The analysis of News Impact Curves demonstrates that GARCH is symmetric, while TGARCH and EGARCH effectively capture the leverage impact of adverse shocks. Notably, the EGARCH model, adept at handling asymmetry and nonlinearity, is found to be the most effective for volatility assessment. These insights are valuable in practice: ARIMA models are ideal for short-term price forecasting, whereas EGARCH offers essential insights into risk. This study equips energy marketers, aviation fuel users, and transportation companies with reliable tools for accurate price and risk forecasts amidst market fluctuation. Additionally, policymakers can leverage these results to enhance

Keywords

SupremacyARIMAGARCHARFIMA & Models

References

Andersena,G.T,Bollerslev, T,Diebold, F, X. and Labys, P (2002) Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility Apergis, N., & Gupta, R. (2016). Are there asymmetric influences of oil price shocks on exchange rate volatility? Evidence from BRICS countries. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 11(7), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2013.877134 Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden- Day. Deebom Z, D, Etuk, H, E and Nwikorga L, W(2021) Properties of Long Memory in Return innovations from Emerging Agricultural Markets. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science VI, 2454-6194 Deebom Z,D, Bharat K,M, B?RB?CIORU, I, C. PALIU-POPA,L,GIL, M, T, Aboko I, S, STEG?ROIU,C, &Ion F(2023) Investigating The Efficacy of Arima And ARFIMA Models In Nigeria All Share Index Markets Geweke, J., & Porter-Hudak, S. (1983). The estimation and application of long memory time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4(4), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9892.1983.tb00371.x Ghosh, S. (2011). Examining crude oil price–Exchange rate nexus for India during the period of extreme oil price volatility. Applied Energy, 88(5), 1886–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.043 Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x Granger, C. W. J., & Joyeux, R. (1980). An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 1(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1980.tb00297.x Granger, C. W. J., & Joyeux, R. (1980). An introduction to long?memory time series models and fractional differencing. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 1(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1980.tb00297.x Hosking, J. R. M. (1981). Fractional differencing. Biometrika, 68(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/68.1.165 Hosking, J. R. M. (1981). Fractional differencing. Biometrika, 68(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/68.1.165 Kumar, S., & Rao, L. S. (2015). Forecasting Crude Oil Prices Using ARIMA and GARCH Models. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 4(6), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.18 Mohammadi, H., & Su, L. (2010). International evidence on crude oil price dynamics: Applications of ARIMA–GARCH models. Energy Economics, 32(5), 1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.06.008 Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260 Tuaneh, G, L, Deebom, Z, D & Akah, V. M (2025) Exploring Long-memory Dynamics in Nigerian Commercial Banks Lending Rates: A Comparative Analysis of ARIMA, ARFIMA, and FIGARCH Models. Asian Journal of Probability and statistics