Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

A Systematic Literature Review on Interdisciplinary STEM Integration Strategies in Mathematics Education

Usmadi, Ergusni

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review on the interdisciplinary approach to integrating STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in mathematics education. The review explores the extent, characteristics, and outcomes of interdisciplinary STEM integration with mathematics as the core discipline. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 65 peer-reviewed, indexed articles published between 2013 and 2024 were thematically analyzed. Findings reveal that interdisciplinary STEM integration enhances mathematical understanding, problem-solving skills, and student engagement, especially when designed through authentic contexts and collaborative pedagogies. However, key challenges persist regarding teacher preparedness, curriculum alignment, and assessment methods. This review offers strategic recommendations for effective STEM curriculum design and directions for future research.

Keywords

STEM integrationmathematics educationinterdisciplinary teachinginstructional

References

Asunda, P. A. (2014). A conceptual framework for STEM integration into curriculum through career and technical education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(3), 10–15. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among STEM subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5–6), 23–37. Bell, R. L. (2016). Connecting science and engineering education practices in meaningful ways. Science Scope, 39(6), 10–15. Berland, L. K. (2013). Designing for science argumentation: Insights from classrooms. Science Education, 97(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21060 Berland, L. K. (2013). Designing for STEM integration. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 3(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1078 Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2017). The effects of STEM PBL on students’ mathematical and scientific achievements. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1672 Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6. Breiner, J. M., Johnson, C. C., Harkness, S. S., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x Brown, R. A., & Brown, J. W. (2010). What is STEM education and why is it important? Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(4), 223–228. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association. Capobianco, B. M., & Radloff, J. (2019). Designing for integrated STEM learning: Insights from four classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 119(6), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12333 Capobianco, B. M., Yu, J. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Effects of engineering design-based science on elementary school science students’ engineering identity development. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20105 Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Sense Publishers. Chalmers, C., Carter, M., Cooper, T., & Buys, L. (2017). Exploring the use of a Maker Space within a school: Developing a framework for research and practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9365-z Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17504.x Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., Wieselmann, J. R., Roehrig, G. H., & Johnson, A. M. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: A comparison of STEM programs with and without engineering. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0172-5 English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7. Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H., Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: A review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694. Henriques, L., & Carreira, S. (2018). Professional development for STEM educators: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0134-2. Herro, D., Quigley, C. F., & Jacques, L. A. (2017). STEM as “situated”: An integrative STEM framework for education in digital contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21380. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612. Hsu, M. C., Purzer, ?., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1037. Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2016). STEM Road Map: A Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753150. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z. Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Han, J., & Choi, D. (2018). A framework for STEM education programs: The role of authentic experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0159-7. Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: What form? What function? Curriculum Brief, 18(3), 1–4. Lantz, K. E., & Kass, J. (2019). Integrating STEM and literacy instruction in the elementary classroom. The Reading Teacher, 72(5), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1804. Lestari, P. A. S., & Widodo, S. A. (2020). Integrating STEM in elementary education: A case study of teachers’ lesson planning in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012041. Li, Y. (2014). International perspectives on STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-3. Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6. Lin, Y. C., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Yeh, Y. F. (2019). Developing an instrument for assessing students’ creativity in science (SCS). International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1612–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1620578. Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in LEGO Mindstorms robot project-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2587–2604. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01240a. Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Systematic review of STEM education: Teacher perceptions and student outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.