Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Improving the Performance of Ad-Hoc Network Using Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Technique

Nnamdi Ahuchaogu, and EN Aneke

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) are an emerging class of network architectures that are characterized by their highly dynamic topology, limited resources (i.e bandwidth and power), and lack of fixed infrastructure. The primary motivation for such networks is increased flexibility and mobility. There are number of paths in ad hoc network for communication between the nodes and selection of the shortest path from those paths is one of the key issues. One of the particularly important networking issues in mobile ad hoc network is Routing. This research explores the use of bandwidth estimation and path selection model in determining the transmission paths with the minimum and maximum delay metric. Furthermore, the delay metrics was identified to be above the threshold of ? 5ms. A modified shortest path algorithm using an Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Technique was developed to reduce the delay, routing over-head caused by flooding, and mitigate the re-routing problems in ad hoc network. A database was also developed using Microsoft structured query language software and class C Internet Protocol (IP) address to enhance easy identification and accessibility of files by the nodes and to checkmate intruders to the network using their Media Access Control (MAC) address. A performance improvement of about 5% was recorded as shown in the simulation result. The developed algorithm has a smaller end-to-end delay when compared to existing ones as it provided a reduced delay metric and enhanced the performance of ad hoc network when implemented. A moderate packet size should be used in ad hoc networks since a larger packet size take a higher time for transmission.

References

Aboelela, S.N.(2014),“Computer Networks: Network Simulation Experiment Manual.2nd ed. San Francisco”Morgan Kaufmann.21 – 43 Abolhasn, F. N.(2015),”performance Enhancement of mobile networks usingquery localization technique. Basant S. et al,(2014) “Performance metrics in Ad hoc Network”. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology.Vol.1 issue 1. Battista, G. D. and Cittadini, L. (2015),”Doing donts:Modifying BGP attributes within and Autonomous system,” in Network Operations and Management Symposium(NOMS), IEEE. Cittadini, L. and Visicchio, S.(2016) “iBGP deceptions: More sessions, fewer routes in INFOCOM Proceedings IEEE, Dovrolis C. and Reena S. (2015) “Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Real Time Application”.International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering 3 (1): 23-25. Fernandez, P. A. and Sendra S. (2014) “Study and Performance of Interior Gateway IP Routing Protocols, “Network Protocols & Algorithms. Vol. 2. Guan, Q. and Ding, Q (2009). “A Minimum energy path topology control Algorithm for wireless multihop networks. Hara, P.A.(2010),”Throughput, Delay and Mobility in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,”IEEE Communications Society,Technical Program 2010. Horneffer, M. and Martini, P. (2014) “Root causes for iBGP routing anomalies,” in local computer Networks (LCN) IEEE 35th Conference Jiang, Y. and Yin, Q. (2014). “Provisioning of Adaptability to Variable topologies for routing schemes in MANETs, “IEEEJ. On selected Areas in Com.Vol. 22. Johansson,G. N. (2014),”Bandwidth efficient AMR Operation for VOIP”IEEE proceedings of the workshop on speech coding,3,150 – 152. Johnson,D. A.(2016),”performance and Analysis of a delay-Threshold Based Bandwidth. Karanakis, S.D. (2015),”IP Routing Fundamentals,”2nd ed,California ciscopress,pp23. Kalyan, G. S. and Prasad, V. V (2014) “Optimal selection of Dynamic Routing Protocol withreal time case studies, “in Recent Advances in Computing and Software Systems (RACSS), International Conference on. Lachhman, S. and Asad, Y. (2013). “Performance analysis of WLAN standards for video conferencing applications”, International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) vol. 3 No 6. Latha, O. and Wilford, H.(2015).”Mobile Ad hoc Network” International Journal Of science and Research, volume 2 issue 4. Mark, N. (2016),”Voice Over IP Technologies”,Building the converged Network”2nded.New York: John Wiley and sons,Inc pp.234 – 237 Mahini, A. and Berangi, R. (2012) “MLET: A power efficient approach for TCAM based IP Lookup Engines in Internet, “International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications, Vol. 2 Maag, S and Sarakbi,B. (2015).“Partial Complete ibgp,” in Communications (ICC) IEEEInternational Conference. Maltz ,(2007),”Quantitative lesson from a full-scale multi- hop wireless ad hoc network testbed,”IEEE 2007. Molnar G. et al,(2014),”Algorithm for Routing protocol.”American Journal of Intelligent Systems 6(2) 31 – 41,DOI: 10.5923/j.aji Owezarski, G. J. (2014) Rethinking IBGP routing” in ACM SIGCOMM ComputerCommunication Review. Patel, B. and Srivastava, S. (2014) “Performance Analysis of Zone routing protocols in Mobile AD Hoc Networks, “Communications (NCC) National Conference. Politis C.et al,(2012)” Secure Routing for Supporting Ad hoc Extreme Emergency Infrastructures,”proc. Of IEEE future and Network Mobile summit. Pasztor, S. and Fengi,W.(2010),”The Packet Size Dependence of packet pair like method,”IEEE/IFIP Int’l,WkspQos. Sawde, K. and Dayanand,A.(2015),”End-to-End Available Bandwidth:Measurement Methodology,Dynamics and Relation with TCP Throughput,”ACM SIGCOMM,34,295- Sportack, G. N.(2013),”IP Routing Fundamentals,”2nd ed. California:cisco press pp.23 Thorenoor, F. K.(2014) “Dynamic Routing protocol implementation decisionBetween OSPF and RIP based on Technical Background using OPNETmodeler second international conference on computer and Network Technology (ICCNT 2014),191 – 195. Tang, J.(2014). “Cross-layer modeling for quality of services guaranteesover wireless links, “IEEE Trans. Wireless. Common. Vol. 6 Tseng,(2016). “A Study of MANET Routing Protocols Joint Node Density Packetlength and Mobility 978-1-4244-7755. Vasudha et al, (2012).“Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for MANETs under Different Traffic Conditions” 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (Volume 6) 978-1-4244-6349. APPENDIX SIMULATION CODES %Effects of transmission Rate on link transmission delay for four hops %(with average link bandwidth in simple network configuration) x = [6126600 15389000 43750000 50000000]; y = [0.012592 0.005221 0.004721 0.004077]; plot(x, y) gridon xlabel('Transmission Rate (Bits/sec)') ylabel('Link delay (microSecs)') %Effects of transmission Rate on link transmission delay for four hops %(with minimum scale bandwidth in complex network configuration) x = [56000 64000 64000 150000 150000]; y = [2.735596 2.735596 0.117884 0.117887 0.117887]; plot(x, y) gridon xlabel('Transmission Rate (Bits/sec)') ylabel('Link delay (microSecs)') %Effects of transmission Rate on link transmission delay for four hops and %five hops with average link bandwidth in simple network configuration) x1 = [6126600 15389000 43750000 50000000]; x2 = [3202400 383000]; y1 = [0.012592 0.005221 0.004721 0.004077]; y2 = [0.006051 0.006998]; plot(x1, y1, 'k', x2, y2, 'r') gridon xlabel('Transmission Rate (Bits/sec)') ylabel('Link delay (microSecs)') legend('Four Hops', 'Five Hops') %Effects of transmission Rate on link transmission delay for four hops and %five hops with minimum link bandwidth in complex network configuration) x1 = [6126600 15389000 43750000 50000000]; x2 = [3202400 383000]; y1 = [0.012592 0.005221 0.004721 0.004077]; y2 = [0.006051 0.006998]; plot(x1, y1, 'k', x2, y2, 'r') gridon xlabel('Transmission Rate (Bits/sec)') ylabel('Link delay (microSecs)') legend('Four Hops', 'Five Hops') %Effects of Packet Size on link transmission delay for four hops %(with minimum scale bandwidth in complex network configuration) x = [10000 15000 20000]; y = [0.004077 0.004721 0.005221]; plot(x, y) gridon xlabel('Packet Size (Bytes)') ylabel('Link delay (microSecs)')

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY