Experimental Investigation of the Structural Performance of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Concentric Loading at Varying Slenderness Ratios

Damini Righteous Gilbert; Orumu ST; John AT

doi:10.56201/ijemt.vol.11.no5.2025.pg218.227

📄 Download Paper

Experimental Investigation of the Structural Performance of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Concentric Loading at Varying Slenderness Ratios

Damini Righteous Gilbert, Orumu ST, and John AT

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the structural performance of circular reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to concentric axial loading, focusing on the effect of varying slenderness ratios. A total of 54 columns were cast using three concrete grades M15, M20, and M25 and tested at six different length-to-diameter (L/D) ratios: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 10. All columns were reinforced with 4Y8 longitudinal bars and tested under uniform loading conditions to evaluate axial load capacity, failure modes, and deformation characteristics. Results showed a significant reduction in axial load capacity with increasing slenderness. For M25-grade concrete, columns with an L/D ratio of 1 achieved a maximum axial load of 287.5?kN, while those with an L/D of 10 carried only 116.7?kN a 59.4% decrease. Similarly, M20 columns dropped from 266.7?kN at L/D 1 to 112.5?kN at L/D 10, reflecting a 57.8% decrease, and M15 columns decreased from 237.5?kN to 95.8?kN, a 59.7% reduction. This confirms that slender columns are more prone to buckling and instability under axial compression. Conversely, concrete grade had a positive influence on capacity. At constant L/D ratios, increasing concrete strength from M15 to M25 led to axial load capacity increases ranging from 15% to 26%, depending on the slenderness. For example, at L/D 5, the load capacity improved by 22.2% when upgrading from M15 (181.7?kN) to M25 (225.0?kN). Failure patterns further validated these results: stocky columns (L/D ? 3) exhibited crushing and ductile behavior, while slender columns (L/D ? 7) failed through buckling with minimal warning. The findings emphasize the critical role of slenderness and concrete grade in axial performance, providing practical insights for structural design and reinforcing the need for code provisions that accurately reflect slenderness effects in circular RC columns.

Keywords

Circularcolumnsaxial loadingslenderness ratiostructural performance

References

ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary. American Concrete Institute. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2004). Guide to formwork for concrete (ACI 347-04). Farmington Hills, MI: ACI. ASTM C150/C150M-22. (2022). Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM International. https://www.astm.org/c150 ASTM C33/C33M-18. (2018). Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM International. https://www.astm.org/c33 ASTM C1602/C1602M-18. (2018). Standard Specification for Mixing Water Used in the Production of Hydraulic Cement Concrete. ASTM International. https://www.astm.org/c1602 ASTM E105-20. (2020). Standard Practice for Probability Sampling Of Materials. ASTM International. https://www.astm.org/e0105 Eurocode 2. (2004). Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. EN 1992-1-1. European Committee for Standardization. IS 456:2000. (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards. Ghannam, S., Najm, H., & Baluch, M. H. (2004). Behavior of normal and high-strength confined concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 101(4), 467–476. Huang, R., Zhang, L., Zhang, C., & Liu, J. (2019). Experimental study on the axial compressive behavior of reinforced concrete columns with different reinforcement ratios. Engineering Structures, 183, 672–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.046 MacGregor, J. G., & Wight, J. K. (2012). Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (4th ed.). Prentice Hall. Saatcioglu, M., & Razvi, S. R. (1992). Strength and ductility of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 118(6), 1590–1607. Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. Wiley. Neville, A. M., & Brooks, J. J. (2010). Concrete Technology (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Varghese, P. C. (2001). Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete (2nd ed.). PHI Learning. BS EN 206-1. (2013). Concrete – Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. British Standards Institution. Afefy, H. M., & Fahmy, M. F. (2015). Experimental investigation on the performance of reinforced concrete columns with different cross-sections under axial load. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 54(3), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.026 Mohammadi, M., Nematzadeh, M., & Rezazadeh Eidgahee, D. (2020). Experimental and numerical study on the behavior of reinforced concrete columns under axial and lateral loading. Structures, 23, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.11.008 Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Song, X. (2021). Axial compression behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tube columns: Experimental investigation and design considerations. Engineering Structures, 232, 111874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111874

Experimental Investigation of the Structural Performance of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Concentric Loading at Varying Slenderness Ratios

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY