Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Impact of Wupa Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent on Wupa River as a Source for Consumption in Zhidu Settlement

ABUBAKAR Shaibu Eneye, ABDULLAHI Ibrahim, SAMINU Ahmed, SANI John, Engbonye, YAQUB Abbas Enesi, ALHASSAN Kabir, Gotip Hope Bege

Abstract

The qualities of the treated effluent of the Wupa Wastewater Treatment Plant located in a rural community of the Federal Capital Territory (Abuja-Nigeria) were assessed over two seasons (wet and dry). This study evaluated the Wupa Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) with acceptable local (National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency –NESREA) and international (World Health Organization-WHO) standards and the effect on the receiving surface water (Wupa River) sources around Zhidu Settlement in Abuja. Surface water exhibited high seasonal variations and high levels of the assayed parameters were observed during the wet season and low at dry season. The results of the effluent during wet season had pH-7.43, electrical conductivity-445.4µS/cm, total dissolved solid (TDS)-172mg/L, total suspended solids (TSS)- 7mg/L, turbidity-4.67NTU, sulphate-5.34mg/l, nitrate-0.8mg/l, fluoride0.55mg/l, biological oxygen demand (BOD)-2.9mg/l, chemical oxygen demand (COD)0.4mg/l, dissolved oxygen (DO)-8.39mg/l, copper (Cu)-0,011mg/l, and zinc (Zn)1.6mg/l while total phosphorous (TP), Iron (Fe)and Lead (Pb) had no presence in the effluent with TC and FC being too numerous to count (TNTC). similar analyses were conducted for dry season of the assayed parameters, showcasing slight differences with pH-7.2, electrical conductivity-333µS/cm, total dissolved solid (TDS)-166mg/l, total suspended solids (TSS)-5mg/L, turbidity-4.97NTU, sulphate5.4mg/l, nitrate-0.8mg/l, fluoride0.51mg/l, biological oxygen demand (BOD)-2.55mg/l, chemical oxygen demand (COD)0.2mg/l, dissolved oxygen (DO)8.35mg/l, copper (Cu) 0,014mg/l, and zinc (Zn)-1.8mg/l. Again, total phosphorous (TP), Iron (Fe)and Lead (Pb) had no presence in the effluent with TC and FC being too numerous to count (TNTC). The study revealed that there was no adverse impact of the effluent water on the receiving water body (River Wupa) in terms of physiochemical parameters and heavy metals, the treated effl

Keywords

WastewaterBODCODHeavy metalWWTPWaterEffluentZhiduWupa.

References

Anzaku, I. M., Ubangari, Y. A., & Polycarp, B. (2022). Assessment of effectiveness of Wupa wastewater treatment plant in Abuja FCT. Balogun, S., & Ogwueleka, T. C. (2021). Coliforms removal efficiency of Wupa wastewater treatment plant, Abuja, Nigeria. Energy Nexus, 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100024 Bashir, I., Lone, F. A., Bhat, R. A., Mir, S. A., Dar, Z. A., & Dar, S. A. (2020). Concerns and threats of contamination on aquatic ecosystems. Bioremediation Biotechnology, 27, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35691-0_129 Burkholder, J., Libra, B., Weyer, P., Heathcote, S., Kolpin, D., Thorne, P. S., & Wichman, M. (2007). Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(2), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8839 Chen, B., Wang, M., Duan, M., Ma, X., Hong, J., Xie, F., et al. (2019). In search of key: Protecting human health and the ecosystem from water pollution in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 101– 111.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle pro.2019.04.228 Chowdhary, P., Bharagava, R. N., Mishra, S., & Khan, N. (2020). Role of industries in water scarcity and its adverse effects on environment and human health. Environmental Concerns and Sustainable Development, 235– 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5889-0_12 Chowdhury, M. A. Z., Banik, S., Uddin, B., Moniruzzaman, M., Karim, N., & Gan, S. H. (2012). Organophosphorus and carbamate pesticide residues detected in water samples collected from paddy and vegetable fields of the Savar and Dhamrai Upazilas in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9), 3318-3329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9093318 CIDWT. (2009). Decentralized wastewater glossary. Retrieved December 17, 2013, from http://www.onsiteconsortium.org/glossary.html Dallas, H. F., Day, J. A., Musibono, D. E., & Day, E. G. (1998). Water quality for aquatic ecosystems: Tools for evaluating regional guidelines. Water Research Commission Report, 626(1), 98. Department of Water Affairs. (2011). Green Drop Handbook, Version 1. Department of Water Affairs: Pretoria, South Africa. Hamdy, A., Shatanawi, M., & Smadi, H. (2005). Urban wastewater problems, risks and its potential use for irrigation. The use of non-conventional water resources (pp. 15–44). CIHEAM/EU- DG Res. Hadiza, A. A., Joseph, S., Abdullahi, A., & Ukah, C. (2023). Assessment of the impact of sewage treatment plant effluents on River Wupa, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. Tropical Built Environment Journal, 9(1). Kazmi, S. S. U. H., Yapa, N., Karunarathna, S. C., & Suwannarach, N. (2022). Perceived intensification in harmful algal blooms is a wave of cumulative threat to the aquatic ecosystems. Biology (Basel, 11(6), 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060852 Wu, H., Gai, Z., Guo, Y., Li, Y., Hao, Y., & Lu, Z. N. (2020). Does environmental pollution inhibit urbanization in China? A new perspective through residents' medical and health costs. Environmental Research, 182,109128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109128 Xiao, J., Wang, L., Deng, L., & Jin, Z. (2019). Characteristics, sources, water quality, and health risk assessment of trace elements in river water and well water in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 650(Pt 2), 2004–2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09322 Xu, X., Yang, H., & Li, C. (2022). Theoretical model and actual characteristics of air pollution affecting health cost: A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 3532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063532 Yan, T., Shen, S. L., & Zhou, A. (2022). Indices and models of surface water quality assessment: Review and perspectives. Environmental Pollution, 308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119611

More Articles from IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT