Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Youth Participation in Climate Diplomacy: Barriers, Regional Disparities, and Policy Impact

Chinazaekpere Ofodile, Salihu Abdulkadir

Abstract

This study explores youth participation in climate diplomacy, focusing on barriers, regional disparities, and policy outcomes. Using a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, the research integrates qualitative and quantitative methods, including interviews, focus groups, surveys, and document analysis. Data were collected from 50 interviews, 5 focus groups, and surveys distributed to 100 youth delegates who participated in COP26–COP28. Observations during COP28 and key policy documents further enriched the analysis. Findings reveal significant financial constraints as a major barrier, particularly for participants from Africa and South America, where 80% relied on external funding. The concept of “youth-washing” emerged, with many participants reporting symbolic inclusion without real influence. Regional disparities were evident, as Europe and Asia demonstrated higher institutional access compared to resource-constrained regions in the Global South. Despite these challenges, youth advocacy achieved notable successes, including the inclusion of intergenerational equity in the Glasgow Climate Pact. The study recommends addressing structural barriers through targeted funding for Global South youth and establishing youth advisory councils within global climate bodies. These measures will ensure more inclusive and meaningful youth participation, advancing equitable climate governance.

Keywords

Youth ParticipationClimate DiplomacyFinancial BarriersYouth-Washing

References

BRICS. (2020). Youth-government partnerships for green policies in BRICS countries. BRICS Summit Report. Checkoway, B. (2017). Youth participation and community change: Policy implications. Youth & Society, 49(2), 123-139. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-167. Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press. Fisher, D. R. (2019). The youth climate movement: From protests to policy influence. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 45-62. Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press. Hossain, K. (2020). Intergenerational equity in climate governance: A youth perspective. Climate Policy Journal, 20(4), 515-528. Kaijser, A., & Kronsell, A. (2014). Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Intersectional Environmentalism Journal, 8(2), 105-123. KIPPRA. (2023). Youth participation in climate diplomacy: Barriers and opportunities. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis Report. Persson, T., & Nemes, S. (2018). Blockchain technology in environmental policy: Enhancing transparency and participation. Environmental Governance Review, 22(3), 312-325. Sloam, J. (2014). The influence of youth political participation on governance and policy outcomes. Political Studies, 62(1), 1-17. Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). The politics of inclusion in climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 14(3), 45-62. Thunberg, G. (2019). No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin Books. UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris- agreement/the-paris-agreement World Youth Festival. (2024). Cross-cultural collaboration at the World Youth Festival: 20,000 voices for climate action. YOUNGO. (2023). Youth climate advocacy and intergenerational equity from COP21 to COP28. Youth Climate Movement. (2020). Global Youth Climate Strike: Mobilizing millions for climate action. Youth Climate Action Report. Zeldin, S., et al. (2017). Youth-led organizations in climate action: Impact and innovation. Journal of Youth Development, 21(1), 56-72.