Rethinking Proficiency in the Language of Teaching and
Learning (LoTL) as a Pillar in the Learning of School
Mathematics

Nick Vincent Otuma; Robert Kati; Duncan Wasike

doi:https://doi.org/10.56201/ijelcs.v7.no1.2022.pg63.75

📄 Download Paper

Rethinking Proficiency in the Language of Teaching and Learning (LoTL) as a Pillar in the Learning of School Mathematics

Nick Vincent Otuma, Robert Kati, Duncan Wasike

Abstract

Although English has become the preferred language of instruction in most classrooms, including those of mathematics across the world today, it will still remain a second language (L2) to many students and their teachers for a long time to come. In mathematics language research, the attention so far given to the role of English as the Language of Teaching and Learning (LoTL) has been with the regard to the impact of levels of student proficiency in the language. This perhaps explains why those who learn in English as their first language (L1) are perceived as proficient in mathematical language, while L2 learners have to attain a level of proficiency in English first. This is in spite of the current absence of clear benchmarks for satisfactory proficiency in English for successful general learning in school mathematics. The poignant question remains: must L2 learners learn mathematics in English given the double jeopardy they face? This paper presents a critical analysis of findings of students’ interpretation of lexical vocabulary common in mathematics texts and in the classroom language typical of mathematics students in L2 contexts, to highlight the general difficulty of this language (English) to the mathematics learners. The main study from which the paper is extracted employed multiple-case study design to examine Mathematical Language (ML) usage and learners’ conceptual understanding of mathematics in secondary schools in Kenya. Data were collected by questionnaires, classroom observations and interviews. The findings of the paper indicate that a majority of L2 students have low proficiency in LoTL; socio-economic background is a factor of proficiency in the LoTL, and mathematics teachers were not aware of the importance of language in learning mathematical concepts. The main conclusion of the paper is that interpretation of mathematical concepts is language dependent which is a challenge to learners not versed in the LoTL. The paper reco

Keywords

First languageSecond languagelexical vocabularyLanguage of Teaching and Learning.

References

Breton, D. (2016). Current Teaching Practices in the Teaching of Mathematics in English to Swedish Speaking Students. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Högskolan Dalarna, Stockholm, Sweden. Cambridge. Eidelwein, M. H., & Mottin, I. P. (2021). English language at school from the point of view of students and teachers: Implications on teaching and learning. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching journal, 12 (1), 2178-2190. Finlayson, R., & Madiba, M. (2002). The intellectualisation of the indigenous languages of South Freeman, B. (2018). Creating a middle school Mathematics curriculum for English language learners. Remedial and special education. 29 (1), 9-19. Gibbs, W., & Orton, J. (2004). Language and mathematics. In A. Orton & G. Wain (Eds.), Issues in teaching mathematics (pp. 95-114). London: Cassel. Guerrero, D. M. (2014). Acquiring academic English in one year: An unlikely proposition for English language learners. Urban Education, 39 (4), 1047-1088. Harris, P. J. (1980). Mathematics in Aboriginal schools project: British Council program research Huang, J., & Normandia, B. (2007). Learning the language of mathematics: a study of student writing. International journal of applied linguistics, 17 (3), 294-318. Larger, C. A. (2006). Types of mathematics language reading interactions that unnecessarily hinder algebra learning and assessment. Reading psychology, 27, 165-204. McDonald, J. (2019). There is a difference between engagement and understanding. Journal of college science teaching, 48 (3), 7-12. Meyer, S. A., Prediger, S., Kuzu, T., Wessel, L., & Redder, A. (2019). Is Formal Language Proficiency in the Home Language Required to Profit from a Bilingual Teaching Intervention in Mathematics? A Mixed Methods Study on Fostering Multilingual Students? Conceptual Understanding? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 17, 317–339. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2002). Secondary Education Syllabus (vol. 2). Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education. Morgan, C. (2005). Word, definitions and concepts in discourses of Mathematics, teaching and learning. Language and Education, 19 (2), 102-116. Odhiambo, K. K. A., & Gunga, O. S. (2010). The Impact of the Interaction between Verbal and Mathematical Languages in Education. Thought and Practice: A Journal of the mathematics Pimm, D. (1989). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge.

Rethinking Proficiency in the Language of Teaching and Learning (LoTL) as a Pillar in the Learning of School Mathematics

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION STUDIES