IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (IJGEM )

E-ISSN 2504-8821
P-ISSN 2695-1878
VOL. 11 NO. 6 2025
DOI: 10.56201/ijgem.vol.11.no6.2025.pg52.60


An Analysis of the Pattern of Residential Mobility in Nigeria Urban Cities: Case of Aba and Enugu Metropolis

Okoye Veronica, Emenyeonu Paul Chidiebere


Abstract


s The movement of households within an area is an increasingly important issue which has attracted renewed research interest over the years many in developed countries. No empirical study, however, have been carried out on the pattern of these residential location choice among the residents on the different residential densities in the urban areas. The thrust of this study therefore is to examine the pattern of residential mobility in Aba and Enugu metropolis, Nigeria. Survey research design was employed in this study. The data were derived from a questionnaire survey of 799 household heads in the areas that have had residential mobility. The questionnaire method was used to elicit both qualitative and quantitative data. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse the findings. The results revealed that the intra-neighborhood residential mobility incidence had the highest residential mobility frequency in Enugu metropolis while the inter-residential density mobility had the highest residential mobility frequency in Aba. The understanding of the patterns would aid/help urban planners and policy makers in decision making with regard to neighbourhood and house design in Nigeria


keywords:

residential mobility, Households, frequency, densities, pattern




Alonso, W 1964, Location and Land Use, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusets.
Bayoh, I, Irwin, EG & Haab, T 2006, 'Determinants of Residential Location Choice: How
Important are Local Public Goods in Attracting Homeowners to Central City Locations?'
Journal of Regional Science, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 97–120
Beatty, C., Lawless, P., Pearson, S. andWilson, I. 2009. Residential mobility and outcomechange
in deprived areas: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme, Areport,
Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Department for Communitiesand
Local Government, Sheffield, Hallam University
Clark, W. A. V, (2006). “Mobility, Housing Stress and Neighbourhood Contexts: Evidence from
Los Angeles. Environment and Planning, Vol 38 (6), PP. 1077-1093.
Clark, W.A. and J.O. Huff. 1977. Some Empirical Tests of Duration-of-Stay
Effects in Intraurban Mobility. Environment and Planning A, 9, 1357-1374.
Colwell, PF, Dehring, CA & Turnbull, GK 2002, 'Recreation Demand and Residential Location',
Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 51, pp. 418–28.
Dowding, K & John, P 2002, 'Fiscal Mobility in Metropolitan England'.
Freedman, O & Kern, CR 1997, 'A model of workplace and residence choice in
two worker households', Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 27, pp. 241-60.
Gbakeji and Ojeofo, (2007) Assessment of Residents' Satisfaction with Public Housing in Abuja,
Nigeria, Habitat internationl., Vol. 21, No 4, pp 445-460.
Graves, P.E. and P.D. Linneman. 1979. Household Migration: Theoretical and Empirical. Journal
of Urban Economics, 6, 383-404.
Graif, C. 2012. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Residential Mobility Pathways of theUrban
Poor: A Spatial Network Approach, Population Association of America, AnnualMeeting
Guo, J. Y and Bhat, C. R, (2006). Operationalizing the concept of neighbourhood: Application to
residential location choice analysis', Journal of Transport Geography.
Hoang, HP & Wakely, P 2000, 'Status, Quality and the Other Trade-off: Towards a
New Theory of Urban Residential Location', Urban Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 7-35.
John, P, Dowding, K & Biggs, S 1995, 'Residential Mobility in London: A Micro-
Level Test of the Behavioural Assumptions of the Tiebout Model', British Journal of
Political Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 379-97.
Kim, JH, Pagliara, F & Preston, J 2005, 'The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice
Behaviour', Urban Studies, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1621–36.
Krizek, K 2003, 'Transit Supportive Home Loans: Theory, Application, and Prospects for Smart
Growth', Housing Policy Debate, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 657-77.
Krizek, K & Waddell, P 2002, 'Analysis of Lifestyle Choices', Transportation Research Record,
no. 02-3424, p. 119.
Limon, R.A.J. 2010. Towards a Description of Migrant Diversity and Residential Segregation in
the Cities of Hermosillo and Nogales, Sonora, Journal of the Southwest, 52 (1): 71
Melanie, M. and Carey, C. (2006). Housing Mobility and Location Choice: A Review of the
Literature. Urbanet Working Paper No 2.
Myers, D & Gearin, E 2001, 'Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential
Environments', Housing Policy Debate, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 633-59
National Population Commission (NPC) (2006). National Population Commission, Enugu.
IIARD International Journal of Geography & Environmental Management
Vol. 11 No. 6 2025 E-ISSN 2504-8821 P-ISSN 2695-1878 www.iiardjournals.org online version
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development
Page 60
Olatubara, C.O. (2008):“The Importance of Households’ Urban Activity Distribution in
Residential Mobility: The Workplace Decoy”. Ilorin Journal of Business and Social
Science Vol. 7 Nos. 1 & 2 pp. 1-16.
Ozo, A. N. (1986). Low cost urban housing strategies in Nigeria. Habitat International, 14, 41–
Pawson, R & Bramley, J (2000) “A user oriented housing choice model”, Urban Plaut, PO 2006,
'The intra-household choices regarding commuting and housing', Transportation Research
Part A.
Reshovsky, A 1979, 'Residential Choice and the Local Public Sector: An Alternative Test of the
Tiebout Hypothesis', Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 501-20.
Richardson, H.W (1977), 'A Generalisation of Residential Location Theory', Regional Science
and Urban Economics, vol. 7, pp. 251-66. Systems, vol. 2, pp. 133-42.
Sampson, R, J and Raudenbush, R. W. (1997). Neighbourhood and Violent Crime: A Multilevel
Study of Collective Efficasy”. Science Vol. 277 (5328) PP. 918-924.
Sirgy, MJ, Grzeskowiak, S & Su, C 2005, 'Explaining housing preference and choice: The role
of self-congruity and functional congruity', Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,
vol. 20, pp. 329–47.
Shear, W.B. 1983. Urban Housing Rehabilitation and Move Decision. Southern Economic
Journal, 49, 1030-1052.
Speare, A. 1974. Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility.
Demography, 11, 173-188.
Temkin K and Rohe W. (1996): “Neighbourhood Change and Urban Policy, Journal of planning
Education and Research. Vol. 15 (3), PP 159-170.
Theodos B and Turner M. A (2012). Residential Mobility and Neighbourhood Change: Real
Neighbourhoods Under the Microscope. Cityscape: A Jpournal of Policy Development and
Research, Vol 14 (3), PP. 55-89
Van Ommeren, JN, Rietvald, P & Nijkamp, P 1998, 'Spatial moving behavior of two earner
households', Journal of Regional Science, vol. 38, pp. 23-41.
Vogt, CA & Marans, RW 2004, 'Natural resources and open space in the residential decision
process: a study of recent movers to fringe countiesin southeast Michigan', Landscape and
Urban Planning, no. 69, pp. 255–69.
Wolpert, G. 1966. Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress. Journal of Social Issues,
22, 92-102.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo