IIARD International Institute of Academic Research and Development

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND LEADERSHIP RESEARCH (JPSLR )

E-ISSN 2504-883X
P-ISSN 2695 2432
VOL. 11 NO. 4 2025
DOI: 10.56201/jpslr.vol.11.no4.2025.pg64.76

---

The United Nations Agencies and the Axis of Evil

Chukwuyem Iharagbon

---

Abstract

This study critically examines the role of United Nations (UN) agencies in conflicts involving Israel and Iran-backed actors, particularly the alleged institutional bias that influences perceptions and responses to Israel's security policies. This research investigates three main objectives: assessing the neutrality of UN evaluations, analyzing the impact of biased portrayals on Israel’s conflict resolution efforts, and examining Iran’s strategies for leveraging multilateral institutions for geopolitical gains. Utilizing realism and securitization theory, the study explores how Israel's security measures are perceived internationally and the implications for regional stability. Methodologically, qualitative case studies and content analysis of UN resolutions, official statements, and reports are used to provide historical and political context. The findings suggest that addressing institutional impartiality could strengthen the UN’s credibility as a mediator in the Middle East conflict, fostering a more constructive environment for regional peace and security. Key recommendations include establishing neutral monitoring bodies within the UN, enhancing balanced reporting, and implementing safeguards against coalition biases.

keywords:

United Nations, Axis of Evil, Neutrality, Aggressor, Geopolitical Advantage

---

References:

Bayefsky, A. (2009). Evaluating bias in UN resolutions on Middle Eastern conflicts. Human Rights
Journal, 12(4), 25-40.
Bayefsky, A. (2014). The UN and the Israel question: A history of bias and double standards.
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.
Bennis, P. (2020). Challenging the UN system: Addressing bias in the Middle East.
Beth, B. (2024) UN Accused of downplaying Hamas terrorists' use of Gaza hospitals as new report ignores
important ; Fox News; https://www.foxnews.com/world/un-accused-downplaying-hamas-
terrorists-use-gaza-hospitals-new-report-ignores-important-details
Berman, E. (2017). The conduct of armed groups in urban warfare: A case study of Gaza.
International
Journal
of
Conflict
and
Security
Studies,
22(3),
301-315.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2017.1280839
Bush, G. W. (2002). State of the union address. White House Archives.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne
Rienner Publishers.
Cox, F. D., & Paddon Rhoads, E. A. (2020). The local turn in peacebuilding.
Ehteshami, A., & Zweiri, M. (2012). Iran and the rise of its neoconservatives.
Erdman, J. (2022). Iran’s proxy wars and the challenge to Middle East stability. Middle East
Journal, 76(2), 145-162.
Esfandiary, D., & Tabatabai, A. (2015). Iran’s policy in the region: Navigating sanctions and
influence.
Esfandiary, D., & Tabatabai, A. (2015). Iran’s ISIS policy.
Haley, N. (2018). Critique of UNHRC's focus on Israel. United Nations Press Release.
Human
Rights
Watch.
(2021).
Gaza:
Hamas’s
use
of
civilian
infrastructure.
https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/05/15/gaza-hamas-use-civilian-infrastructure
International Crisis Group. (2021). How to avoid another war in Gaza. Crisis Group Report.
Katzman, K. (2020). Iran sanctions. Congressional Research Service.
Kfir, I. (2020). Israel’s defensive strategies and international responses: A critical analysis. Journal
of Global Security Studies, 5(3), 234-250.
Koren, G. (2020). Urban warfare and the challenges of military operations in built-up areas.
Journal
of
Military
Ethics,
19(2),
115-133.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2020.1815354
Landler, M., & Gladstone, R. (2018). Iran opens legal fight against U.S. sanctions at international
court. The New York Times.
Levitt, M. (2013). Hezbollah: The global footprint of Lebanon's party of God. Georgetown
University Press.
Litvak, M. (2020). Iran and the Arab world after the nuclear deal: Rivalry and engagement in a
new era. C. Hurst & Co.
Lynk, M. (2020). Mandates and responsibilities of the UN in occupied territories. UN Human
Rights Special Reports.
Mills, M. (2021). Objectivity and consistency in UN conflict evaluation.
Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A.
Knopf.
Parsi, T. (2012). Treacherous alliance: The secret dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States.
Yale University Press.
Ross, D., & Makovsky, D. (2019). Be strong and of good courage: How Israel’s most important
leaders shaped its destiny. PublicAffairs.
Smith, J. (2022). Geopolitical influences on UN decision-making in Middle East conflicts. Journal
of Global Politics, 14(1), 52-70.
Stein, K. (2021). Selective accountability and its impact on Israel-Iran relations. Journal of
International Affairs, 74(4), 101-121.
Steinberg, G. (2019). Language in UN resolutions: A critical analysis of consistency. Middle East
Policy, 26(3), 123-134.
Tabatabai, A. (2019). Iran and the United States: An insider’s view on the failure of relations.
Tabatabai, A., & Esfandiary, D. (2015). Iran and the challenge of multilateralism.
UN Charter. (1945). Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice.
United Nations.
UNDP. (2022). UNDP in Iran.
UNHCR. (2022). Iran Factsheet.
United Nations. (2015). UN report on 2014 Gaza conflict. United Nations Publications.
United Nations Human Rights Council. (2020). Reports and resolutions on Israel. UNHRC
Archive.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2023). Gaza: Humanitarian
concerns amid ongoing hostilities. https://www.unocha.org/gaza-humanitarian-concerns
Wehrey, F. (2018). Beyond Sunni and Shia: Sectarianism in a changing Middle East.
WHO. (2021). COVID-19 response in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

DOWNLOAD PDF

---

Back