RESEARCH JOURNAL OF MASS COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (RJMCIT )
E-ISSN 2545-529X
P-ISSN 2695-2475
VOL. 11 NO. 2 2025
DOI: 10.56201/rjmcit.vol.11.no2.2025.pg1.15
Ndanaacha Alfred, Wavi Pur Mamza PhD
This study examined the impact of digital resources on the educational experiences of Degree Students at Adamawa State College of Education, Hong. The study was guided by four objectives which include: ascertaining the impact of digital resources on the speed and accuracy of information dissemination; determining the role of digital resources in shaping public opinion and influencing decision-making processes; assessing the effectiveness of digital resources in promoting equality access to information and bridging the knowledge gap and, Determine the relationship between gender difference and digital resource information dissemination among Degree Students in Adamawa State College of Education Hong. In line with the objectives, three research questions and one hypothesis were raised and answered. The study adopted a survey design while a questionnaire was used for data collection. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation to answer the research questions where the null hypothesis was tested using regression analysis using SPSS version 20. The study shows that digital resources significantly enhance the speed and accuracy of information dissemination among students as indicated by mean scores ranging from 3.13 to 3.94; The findings show that digital resources have a substantial influence on shaping public opinion and guiding decision- making processes among students as indicated by the mean scores ranging from 2.98 to 4.21; The study found that digital resources are highly effective in promoting equal access to information and bridging the knowledge gap with a mean scores ranging from 3.32 to 3.76 and, A positive high relationship [r = 0.72] exists between gender difference and digital information resource dissemination among Degree Students in Adamawa State College of Education Hong. Consequently, a significant relationship exists between gender difference and digital information
Digital; Information Resources; dissemination; Students, Adamawa State College of
Ahlberg, C., Williamson, C., & Shneiderman, B.(2019). Dynamic queries for information
exploration: An implementation and evaluation. In B. Shneiderman (Ed.). The sparks of
innovation in human-computer interaction. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 1994, pp. 281-294.
Ajai, J. T., and Imoko, B. I. (2015). Gender differences in mathematics achievement and retention
scores: a case of problem-based learning method. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 1, 45–50
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing:
A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York:
Anderson, T. (2018). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca Universit Press.
Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning.
Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation,
and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford University Press.
Björk, B.-C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2010). Scientific Journal Publishing: Yearly Volume and
Open Access Availability. Information Research, 15(1), paper 429.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives,
Local Designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bugler, M., McGeown, S. P., and St Clair-Thompson, H. (2015). Gender differences in
adolescents' academic motivation and classroom behavior. Educ. Psychol. 35, 541–556.
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.84932
Carvalho, R. G. G. (2016). Gender differences in academic achievement: the mediating role of
personality. Personal. Individ. Differ. 94, 54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.011
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big
Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode
Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., and Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender
differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136, 103–127. doi:
10.1037/a0018053
Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., & Bello, A. O. (2018). The Utilisation of E-Learning Facilities in
the Educational Delivery System of Nigeria: A Study of M-University. International
Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 34.
Farooq, M., Chaudhry A., Shafiq M. and Berhamu G. (2011). Factors Affecting Students' Quality
of Academic Performance: A case of secondary school level. J. of Quality and Technology
Manag.. 7(2), 01-14.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Ghazvini, S. D., and Khajehpour, M. (2011). Gender differences in factors affecting academic
performance in high school students. Procedia Social Behav. Sci. 15, 1040–1045. doi:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.236
Hewlett Foundation. (2013). Open Educational Resources: Breaking the Boundaries of Education.
Hewlett Foundation.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016
Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Khan, S., Saeed, A., & Qureshi, M. A. (2017). Ensuring Accuracy in Digital Information: The
Role of Quality Control Mechanisms. Information Processing & Management, 53(2), 346-
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, New Epistemologies, and Paradigm Shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1),
1-12.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (5th ed.). Sage
Publications.
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How
We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Narad, A., & Abdullah, B. (2016). Academic performance of senior secondary school students:
Influence of parental encouragement and school environment. Rupkatha Journal on
Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, Special Issue, 3(2), 12-19
Okebukola, P. (2020). Adapting to the New Normal in Education: The Impact of COVID-19 on
Teaching and Learning. African Journal of Educational Research, 24(1), 1-12.
Olajide, O. & Adio, G. (2017). Effective Utilization of University Library Resources by
Undergraduate Students: A Case Study of Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria: Library
Philosophy
and
Practice
(e-journal).
http://digitalcommons.uni.edu/lib
philprac/1503
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury Academic.
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline. American Behavioral
Scientist, 57(1), 35-50.
Singh, S. P., Malik, S. & Singh, P. (2016). Factors affecting academic performance of students.
Indian Journal of Research, 5(4), 176-178.
Smith, D. (2019). Digital Libraries and Information Access: A Global Perspective. Library
Management, 40(1/2), 56-70.
Spector, J. M. (2015). Foundations of Educational Technology: Integrative Approaches and
Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing
Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes. Review of Research in Education,
34(1), 179-225.
Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). An Argument for Clarity: What Are Learning
Management Systems, What Are They Not, and What Should They Become? TechTrends,
51(2), 28-34.
Weller, M. (2014). The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice.
Bloomsbury Academic.
Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education.
JISC CETIS.