IIARD International Institute of Academic Research and Development

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION STUDIES (IJMCS )

E-ISSN 2545-5273
P-ISSN 2695-2173
VOL. 8 NO. 4 2024
DOI: 10.56201/ijmcs.v8.no4.2024.pg101.117

---

Framing of the G-5 Governors by Select Nigerian Newspapers: The Trajectory, Convergences and Divergences

ALAWA, Louis, PROF. G.B. Okon, PROF. R.N. Amadi, Dr. H.W. Dike

---

Abstract

This study investigated how The Punch, The Guardian and The Vanguard newspapers reported the activities of the G5 governors in the build up to the 2023 general elections in Nigeria. The primary focus was to evaluate the perspectives from which the reporters framed the G5 governors' stories before, during and after the elections. The study delineated three objectives which traversed on the need to determine how The Punch, The Guardian and the Vanguard newspapers framed the activities of the G5 governors, identify the dominant frames used in the reportage of the G5 governors by the newspapers reviewed. Framing and Conflict theories guided the study. The design adopted was content analysis and the reports on the G5 governors from the three newspapers between April, 1st 2022 and March 31st 2023 constituted the data for analysis. Using a constructed calendar, 48 issues on the G5 governors were selected as the sample for the study. The study found from the analysis that the three newspapers framed the activities of the G5 governors mainly as straight news stories and interviews. While some stories were sourced from press briefings, others were through interviews as disclosed from the reviewed stories. It was also found that the dominant frames used by the three newspapers were peace reconciliation and political frames. The insights recorded from the stories were the intents of the G5 governors as intertextual referencing was not done to link previous actions of the governors to their agitations during the electoral process. The study concludes that while it is pertinent that journalists be neutral and objective when choosing angles to a story, it is clear that neutrality can be relative especially when these journalists are hoodwinked or restrained by editorial policy, socio-religious attachments, educational competence, personal beliefs and general social upbringing as well as the need to survive. From the findings made in the stud

keywords:

Framing, G-5 Governors, Convergence, Divergence

---

References:

Amadi, F. (2013). Errors in Nigeria’s communication theories (3rd Ed.). Port Harcourt:
Charlesworth.
Amadi, F. (2016). Misrecognized discourses: An instructive monograph. Port Harcourt: Geocilia
Intergrated Services LTD.
Baran, S & Davis, B. (2012). Mass media theory, (6the edition). New York. Wadsworth Centage.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive
elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1),
103–126.
Fairhurst, G. & Sarr, R. (2006). The art of framing. Jossey-Bass.
Francis, A. (2017). Print media framing of the Niger Delta conflict in two selected Nigerian
newspapers: An appraisal of the role of ICT as a tool for participatory democracy in
Nigeria. Journal of Management and Social Sciences.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northern
University
Press.
Available
at:
https://urup.or.id/wp-
content/uploads/2020/07/Erving_Goffman_Bennett_Berger_Frame_Analysis_BookFi.pdf
Gorp, V. B. (2007).The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back. Journal of
Communication.57:60-78.
Holliman, R. (2010). Media convergence. In: Priest, Susanna ed. Encyclopaedia of Science and
Technology Communication. Sage.
Jenkins, H. (2006a). Convergence and divergence. Two sides of the same process. 29 June.
Confessions
of
an
Aca-fan.
Available
at:
http://henryjenkins.org/2006/06/convergence_and_divergence_two.html4
Jenkins, H. (2006b). Convergence culture. New York UP.
Mayer, L. H. (2008). What is this lobbying that we are so worried about? Available at:
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/186
Merilainen, N. & Vos, M. (2011). Framing issues in the public debate of human rights. Corporate
Communication, 16, 293-310.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49 (4):
103-22.
Wurth, K. B., Espi, S. R. & Ven, I. (2013). Visual text and media divergence. European Journal
of English Studies, 17(1), 92-108

DOWNLOAD PDF

---

Back