INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION STUDIES (IJMCS )

E-ISSN 2545-5273
P-ISSN 2695-2173
VOL. 8 NO. 2 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56201/ijmcs.v8.no2.2024.pg38.60


Corporate Tax Avoidance and Cash Holdings of Quoted Non- Financial Firms in Nigeria

Lawrence, U. Egbadju


Abstract


This study investigates if there is any relationship between tax avoidance and cash holding cash holdings of non-financial listed firms in Nigeria. It uses secondarily sourced panel data over the period from 2005 to 2020 of 75 such firms listed on the floor of the Nigerian Exchange Group (NXG). The generalized method of moments (GMM) results reveal that nine (9) of the variables (LGCAT, HS, SHT, CT, ED, PD, PBTD, DBTD and TO) are positively and statistically significant with CH1; three variables (LGCUT, BTD and CTO) are negatively and statistically significant with CH1 while seven of the variables (CUT, LCUT, CAT, LCAT and BTDL) are statistically not significant. The study concludes with recommendations.


keywords:

Tax Avoidance, Cash Holdings, Quoted Non-Financial Firms, GMM, NXG.


References:


Ahmed, A. (2019).Impact of subsidiary locations & corporate governance on tax haven
utilization.Evidence from developed world multinational enterprises.(Doctoral thesis,
Aston University. Open Access).

Al Rubaye, A.R.N., Foroghi, D., Hashemi, S.A. (2024). The effect of firm size on the
relationship between tax avoidance and cash holdings. Montenegrin Journal of
Economics, 20(1), 165-174.
Alejo, J., Galvao, A., Montes-Rojas, G. M. & Sosa-Escudero, W. (2015). Tests for normality in
linear panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 15 (3), 822–832.

Andhitiyara, S. R. & Dameria, R. P. (2022).The influence of corporate governance on tax
avoidance (study on basic industry and chemicals companies listed on the Indonesia
stock exchange).International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research
(IJEBAR)6 (1), 304-313

Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo
evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies.
58(2): 277-297.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back