JOURNAL OF LAW AND GLOBAL POLICY (JLGP )

E-ISSN 2579-051X
P-ISSN 2695-2424
VOL. 10 NO. 1 2025
DOI: 10.56201/JLGP.vol.10.no1.2025.pg1.36


“Covering The Field” In Justice System: The Ethical Foundation for Reliance on Scientific and Technologically Driven Justice Delivery

Stephen L W Nyeenenwa PhD


Abstract


The hallmark of a good justice delivery system is one that is unbiased, fast, timely, impartial and efficient in the determination of issues brought to court. “Justice delayed is justice denied” is an assertion that places emphasis on why the courts should be a timely, effective and efficient arbiter of cases brought before them occasioned by its delivery of the final verdict. The court cannot perform magic, because they depend on the working tools and materials its disposal in the adjudication of disputes. Over the years, we have come to know that the problems that bedevil our judiciary system are enormous, and include the massive backlog of cases, poor maintenance of e- courts records, the judiciary’s non digitalisation, partiality, an unsavoury harvest of needless delaying interlocutory appeals, executive interference, disobedience to court orders and lack of total independence of the judicial arm of government. We are similarly aware of the damaging effects caused by poor case management, legal research, document automation, online dispute resolution, access to justice, legal analytics, e-discovery, e-filing, artificial-enabled referencing and online hearings. I will in this article seek to unravel how the courts and security agencies can successfully harness technological innovations in overcoming and resolving the intractable ills that have for long dogged the judiciary. Such ills include because I believe that deploying an adequate data-based planning and safeguards, technological tools can be a game changer. This paper knows and takes these problems as given, hence I am minded to examine the ethical foundation in support of the court’s reliance on scientific and technologically driven justice, especially, with the explosion in the evolution and utility of science, technology and the all- pervasive artificial intelligence. The ethical application of scientific, technological and artificial intelligent (AI) tools in crime


keywords:

Covering-the-field, AI, Science, technology, justice, speedy trial.


References:


Abubakar, M. D., Hon Justice of Nigeria – NPOM. (2018) “Impact of Technology On The Law
And Court Process” Refresher lecture delivered in a workshop to Judges & Kadis oganised
by the National Judicial Institute, Nigeria.
Anderez, Dario Ortega; Kanjo, Eiman; Anwar, Amna; Johnson, Shane, and David, Lucy M.
(August 31, 2024). “The Rise Of Technology In Crime Prevention: Opportunities, Challenges
And Practitioners’ Perspectives.” London, UK, UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security & Crime
Science. (A Reprint). Ref: arXiv:2102.04204v1[cs.CY]. 26th January, 2021.
Aristotle. (1984). The Nicomachean Ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete
Works of Aristotle (Vol. 2). New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York, Free
Press.
Biard, Alexandre; Hoevenaars, Jos; Kramer, Xandra; and Themeli, Erlis. (2021). “The Future of
Access to Justice—Beyond Science Fiction” in New Pathways to Civil Justice in Europe:
Challenges of Access to Justice, Zandra Kramer, Alexandre Biard, Jos Hoevanaars and Erlis
Themeh (Editors), accessed from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66637-8_1, pp 1 – 20.
Springer Nature Publishing, Cham. ISSBN: 978-3-030-66637-8.
Castells, Manuel. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd Edition, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
Dhru, Kanan, Nikam, Manasi & Barendrecht, Maurits. (2024) Use Of Digital Technologies In
Judicial Reform And Access To Justice Cooperation, Hill, Kanan Dhru, Innovation
Researcher kanan.dhru@hiil.org Manasi Nikam Knowledge Management Officer
manasi.nikam@hiil.org Maurits Barendrecht Director Research & Development
maurits.barendrecht@hiil.org accessed from The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law at
www.hiil.org.org and dashboard.hiil,org.
Duff, R. A., & Garland, D. (Eds.). (1994). A Reader on Punishment. Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Enumah, Alex. 8th July, 2020. “Virtual Court Sitting Not Unconstitutional, Supreme Court Rules”
in THISDAYLIVE Newspaper.
Ellul, Jacques. (1964). The Technological Society. (Trans by John Wilkinson). New York, Vintage
Books
Feynman, Richard P. (1985). Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! New York, W. W. Norton &
Company.
Franklin, Ursula. (1999). The Real World of Technology. Toronto Canada, House of Anansi Press.
Heever, J. Van den & Jones, C., 2019, ‘The evolution of morality’, in J. Van den Heever & C.
Jones (eds.), Moral Issues in the Natural Sciences and Technologies, pp. 1–26, AOSIS, Cape
Town. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2019.BK114.01)
Idoniboye, O. and Nyeenenwa, S.L.W. “Risk Management Strategies in the Nigerian Oil
Industry: A Logical Analysis using John Stuart Mill's Canons of Inductive Reasoning” in
Nigerian Journal of Oil & Gas Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 31 – 49.
Kelsen, H. (2000). What is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science: Collected
Essays. Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Kizilhan, Taner & Kizilhan, Sevil Bal. (2016). “Book Review: The Rise of the Network Society -
The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture” in Contemporary Educational Technology,
2016, 7(3), 277-280 277.
Kloosterman, Ate, Mapes, Anna, Geradts, Zeno, Van Eijk, Erwin, Koper, Carola, Van Den berg,
Jorrit, Verheij, Saskia, Van der Steen, Marcel & Van Asten, Arian (5th August, 2015). “The
Interface Between Forensic Science And Technology: How Technology Could Cause A
Paradigm Shift In The Role Of Forensic Institutes In The Criminal Justice System”
Philosophical
Transactions
R.
Soc.
B
370
Accessible
from
https://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Llagami, Naureda. (2024) “The Use of the Technology in Justice System” in Global Journal of
Politics and Law Research, Vol.12, No.4, pp.66-82.
McKay, Carolyn. (2018) The Pixelated Prisoner: Prison Video Links, Court ‘Appearance’ and the
Justice Matrix. London, Routledge.
Mik, Eliza. (2016) “Private Lawmaking in Commercial Cyberspace” in Pandora’s Box: Law &
Technology, by Gifford, Madeleine & Potts, Michael (Editors), p. 115 – 126.
Mohammed, Mohammed Ndarani & Nyeenenwa, Stephen L. W. (2024). “Enhancing Judicial
Independence for Sustainable Democratic Governance in Nigeria: A Path towards Building
Public Confidence” in Alkebulan, A Journal of West and East African Studies Volume 4,
Issue 1. https://gnosipress.com.ng/index.php/alkebulan. ISSN (Online): 2971-6187.
Published 30 March 2024.
National Academy of Engineering. (2003). A Century of Innovation: Twenty Engineering
Achievements that Transformed Our Lives. Joseph Henry Press.
National Academy of Sciences. (2008). Science, Evolution, and Creationism. National Academies
Press.
Olivé, Leon. “Introduction To Ethics Of Science And Technology In History And Philosophy Of
Science And Technology” – in Introduction to Ethics of Science and Technology, Vol III –
Leon Olive ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Accessed from E6-89-15-
00%20ETHICS%20OF%20SCIENCE%20AND%20TECHNOLOGY%201.pdf
on
19th
June, 2024 at 21.25.
Omohomhion, Felix. July 14, 2020, “Supreme Court Dismisses Suits Against Virtual Hearing” in
BusinessDay Newspaper.
Ponce, Alejandro. 14th June, 2020. “The Role Of Technology To Guarantee Access To Justice” in
LegalTech., accessed from www.fredricoast.com on 12th October, 2024.
Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, Routledge
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Massachusets, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reiling, A. D. (Dory) (2020). “Courts and Artificial Intelligence” in 11 (2) International Journal
for Court Administration8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.343.
Rossi, Francesca. “Artificial Intelligence: Potential Benefits and Ethical Considerations” in
Citizens Rights And Constitutional Affairs – Legal Affairs, Policy Department C, European
Parliament, PE 571.380.
Samovar, Larry A., Porter, Richard E., and McDaniel Edwin R. (2012) Intercultural
Communication: A Reader. Boston, USA. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Massachusets, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sharma, Jogiram (Dr.) & Imran, Mohd. (Dr). (2021). “The Significance Of Technology In The
Indian Legal System And Legal Education: A Comprehensive Examination” in Russian Law
Journal, Volume - IX (2021) Issue 1. (pp. 236 – 241).
Simon, Herbert A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd Ed.). London, England, MIT Press.
Stahl, Bernd Carsten. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future An Ecosystem Perspective
on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. (Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham,
Switzerland, Springer Books.)
Strand, Roger & Kaiser, Matthias. (2015). Report on Ethical Issues Raised by Emerging Sciences
and Technologies - Report written for the Council of Europe, Committee on Bioethics.
(University of Bergen, January, 2015).
Susskind, Richard E. (2019) Online Courts And The Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University
Press
Weinstein, Deena. “Scientific Fraud and Scientific Ethics.” This paper was presented by Professor
Deena Weinstein at the DePaul University, Chicago, IL. May 5, 1981 Seminar of the Center
for The Study of Ethics in the Professions (Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL),
accessed from the web as ScientificFraudandScientificEthics.pdf on the 19th June, 2024 by
21.24 hours.
Zalnieriute, Monica and Bell, Felicity. (2021). ‘Technology and Judicial Role’ in Gabrielle
Appleby and Andrew Lynch (eds.), in The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court: Individual,
Collegial and Institutional Judicial Dynamics in Australia, Cambridge University Press,
2021.59332. DOI – https://doi.org/10.1017/978110885933222.99 GBP. On line ISSBN –
Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science: What


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo