RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PURE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (RJPST )

E-ISSN 2579-0536
P-ISSN 2695-2696
VOL. 7 NO. 4 2024
DOI: 10.56201/rjpst.v7.no4.2024.pg56.67


Assessing the Impact of Toplight Optimization on Daylighting Performance in a University Sport Complex

WOKPE Emmanuel Gift & OHOCHUKU Chinwennwo Philips


Abstract


Daylight is well-known for its role, reducing artificial lighting consumption and enhancing the wellbeing and performance of building occupants. Daylight availability in buildings faces numerous challenges in a world where energy efficiency, thermal comfort, and sustainability take center stage. However, a crucial issue arises with the incorporation of large windows to introduce natural light, as this may compromise the thermal efficiency of a room. The utilization of daylighting as an effort to reduce the usage of building energy needs to be optimized. This is because, sport complex with large volumes require specific strategies for proper light distribution throughout the space. This study aims to explore and compare the effectiveness of daylighting in the openings design of skylights, roof monitor, and saw-tooth in a university sport complex. This research study undertook a rigorous mixedmethods analysis to examine the impacts of strategic skylight modifications on interior daylight sufficiency, energy performance, and broader user experiences within university sport complex. Designers must strike a delicate balance between optimizing daylight and ensuring thermal comfort to achieve energy- efficient buildings.


keywords:

Sports Complex, TopLighting, Daylight, Climate, Architecture, Strategies


References:


Anthony, Sholanke, Pela Ogheneyoma, Pirisola Heritge, Ogunsade Ayoola and Akerele
Fiyinfoluwa, 2020.
Daylight Penetration in Buildings: Issues in Tropiical Climates'. Soli State Technology 63 (2s).
htttp://solidstatetechnology.us/index.pphp/JSS T/article/view/1530.
Baker, N., & Steemers, K. (2002). Daylight design of buildings. James & James Science
Publishers.
Beltran, L.A. (2005). Advanced daylighting technologies for sustainable architecture. AIJ
Journal, 171, pp. 459-464.
Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2005). Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation
routine 1: A portfolioof feedback techniques. Building Research& Information, 33(4), 347-
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500162022
Chan, Y. C. (2010). Daylighting design: An integrated approach for building project.
Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference.
Chung, J., & Burnett, J. (2017). Investigation of daylight availability and visual
performance in large spaces. Lighting Research & Technology, 49(8), 1026-103
https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153516643922
Demirbilek, O., & Demonja, D. (2004). A daylit classroom: What difference does it make?
Lighting
Research
and
Technology,
36(2),
117-126.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782804li125oa
Galasiu, A. D., & Reinhart, C. F. (2008). Current daylighting design practice: A survey.
Building
Research
&
Information,
36(2),
159-174.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701779048 Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006).
Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems
in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728-742.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001
Green
Building
Tech
HK.
(2007,
December).
Utilization.
Retrieved
from
http://gbtech.emsd.gov.hk/english/minimize/d aylight.html
Heschong, L. (2002). Daylighting and human performance. ASHRAE Journal, 44(6), 65-
Lapisa, Remon, Arwizet Karudin, M. Martias, K. Krismadinata, A. Ambiyar,, Zaid Romani and
Patrick Salagnac, 2020 'Éffect of Skylight Roof Ratio on Warehouse Building Energy
Balance and ThermalVisual Comfort in Hot- Humid Climate Area'. Asian Journal of Civil
Engineering 21 (5): 915-23. https/doi.org/10.1007-020-00249-9.
Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 4: The Probe occupant
surveys and their implications. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 129-
143.https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010007858
Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 4: The Probe Occupant
surveys and their implications. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 129-143.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010007858
Mardaljevic, J., Chandra Mulyana, D.,&Zacarias, M. J. (2019). Visual comfort and
energy use: An integrated approach to illumination and daylighting. Building and
Environment, 148, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.043
Mandala Ariani, and Amirani Ritva Santoso, 2018. Comparative Study of Daylighting
Calculation Methods'. Edited by R.B. Santosa, N.C. Idham, N.G. Yuli and P.AP.
Agustiananda.
SHS
Web
of
Conferences
41
(January);
https://doi.org/10.105/shsconf/20184106001.
Raahmah, Adhelia Adjani and Wafirul Aqli,2020. 'Konsep Arsitektur Biomimetik Pada Banhunan
Oseanarium'.
AETEKS;
Jouurnal
Tekaik
Arsitektur
5
(3);
55-59.
https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR 190993257.
Reinhart, C. F., Mardaljevic, J., & Rogers, Z. (2006). Dynamic daylight performance
metrics
for
sustainable
building
design.
7-
Leukos,
3(1),
https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01. Singh,
M.
K. (2018). Daylighting
techniques and their importance in building design.
Boubekri, M., Lee, J., & Hsu, S. (2014). Daylighting and energy savings in buildings: A
review of the literature. Energy and Buildings, 72, 56-67.
Figueiro, M. G., & Rea, M. S. (2012). The effects of daylighting on the performance o occupants.
Lighting Research & Technology,44(2), 136-154.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back