INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICAL THEORY (IJASMT )

E- ISSN 2489-009X
P- ISSN 2695-1908
VOL. 10 NO. 1 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56201/ijasmt.v10.no1.2024.pg29.44


Determinants of the Optimal and Symmetricity of the Volatility Model for Some Selected Nigerian Stocks

Modupe Stella, Omotayo-Tomo, Ajiboye, A.S. & Adeoti, O.A.


Abstract


Business data always exhibits certain degree of asymmetry and some heteroscedasticity which affect the models and model choice. This asymmetry can be improved to improve the forecasts performance of the model. This work considered cases whereby the errors in the model are normally distributed or normally violate assumption, to improve the efficiency in parameter estimation and forecast as well. The results show that to determine whether volatility require the normal inverse Gaussian distribution, non-normality, and asymmetry which very important in modelling financial returns. Common model selection criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Swartz-Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), were used to determine which recommended model best fits the price and return series to choose. The results show that the best marginal values of the residuals of the GARCH model when estimating Dancem, GTCO, Vitafoam, Nestle, and Fidson were normal inverse Gaussian distributions, respectively.


keywords:

Volatility, Heteroskedastics, Leverage effect, Log-returns, Nigerian Stocks.


References:


Bollerslev, T. (1976) A conditional heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices
and rates of return. Revised Economic Statistics ,69, 542–547.

Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of
Economics., 31, 307–327.
Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control,
Holding Day, a Francisco. 105-111.

Deebom ZD, Essi ID. Modelling price volatility of Nigeria Crude Oil Markets using GARCH
Model: 1987–2017. International Journal of Applied Science & Mathematical
Theory. 2017;4(3):23.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo