Journal of Accounting and Financial Management (JAFM )

E-ISSN 2504-8856
P-ISSN 2695-2211
VOL. 8 NO. 8 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56201/jafm.v8.no8.2022.pg1.10


Accounting for Borrowing and Economic Performance in Nigeria

Emeka, Peters Obiora PhD, Ogochukwu Kenechukwu Aziagba


Abstract


Accounting for public borrowing and economic performance has been under constant investigation. This study examined the impact of public borrowing on economic performance of Nigeria between 1981 to 2021. The study adopted purposive sampling technique and analyzed using robust ordinary least square (ROLS). The independent variables are, Federal government domestic debt (FDD), Federal government foreign debt (FGFD), cost of servicing debt (CSD), Federal government total expenditure (FGTE) is proxy for dependent variable while, Federal government retain revenue (FGRR) is proxy for control variable. The study reveals that that of FGRR, CSD, FGFD and FGDD have positive and significant influence on the federal government total expenditure. The study was theoretically anchored on Dual Gap Analysis Theory, Adam Smith Theory on Debt and The Ricardo Theory of Public Debt. The study then concludes that Nigeria’s total expenditure has risen astronomically through domestic debt, foreign debt, government retained earnings and debt servicing. The study then recommends very strong internal control should be enforced over utilization of borrowed fund, domestically or externally, as well as investigation of the internal control process of borrowing in Nigeria. Again, debt should be reduced so as to reduce the cost burden of servicing it as debt overhang is imminent in Nigeria. The study recommends the investigation of the internal control process of borrowing in Nigeria for further study.



References:


Rafindadi, A.A & Musa, A. (2019). An empirical analysis of the impact of public debt
management strategies on Nigeria’s debt profile. International Journal of Economics
and Financial Issue. 9(2):125-137

Alagba Ochuko S. and Eferakeya Idowu (2019) Effect of public debt on economic growth in
Nigeria: An empirical analysis 1981 – 2018. International Journal of Business and
Economic Development, 7(2), 10-17

Picarelli, M.O; Vanlaer, W & Marneffe, W. (2019). Does Public debt produce a crowding out
effect for public investment in the EU? European Stability Mechanism

Chinanuife, E., Eze, P. and Nwodo, O., (2018). Public debt spiral and domestic investment in
Nigeria. American Journal of Economic Studies 4 (1): 153-161

Kehinde, Olanike, Oni & Achukwi (2015). Public debt and private investment in Nigeria.
America Journal of Economic 5 (5): 501-507.

Akhanolu, I. A.; Babajide, A. A.; Akinjare, V.; Oladeji, T. & Osuma, G. (2018). The effect of
public debt on economic growth in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. International
Business Management, 12(6), 436-441.

Eneida, P.C. (2018). The relationship between public debt and economic Growth in Albania
and Other countries. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(3), 95-102.
DOI: 10.2478/ajis-2018-0061.

Ncanywa, T. & Masoga, M.M. (2018). Can public debt stimulate public Investment and
economic Growth in South Africa? Cogent Economics & Finance, 6, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1516483

Panagiotis, P. (2018). The effect of government debt and other determinants on economic
growth: The Greek experience. Economies, 6(10): 1-19.

Precious, L. N. (2015). Effects of public debt on economic growth in Swaziland.
International Journal of Business and Commerce, 5(1), 1-24.
Chenery, H.B. & Strout, A.M. (1966). Foreign Assistance and Economic Development.
American Economic Review, 56(4), 679-733.

Okoye, L. U., Modebe, N. J., Erin, O. A., & Evbuomwan, G. O. (2013). Effect of external
debt on economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria. Sustainable Economic Growth,
Education Excellence, and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 4046-4058.

Eke, C.K.and Akujiobi, N.E.(2021). Public Debt and Economic Growth in Nigeria: An
Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Development and Management
Review,16(1), 178-192


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back