INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (IJEFM )

E-ISSN 2545-5966
P-ISSN 2695-1932
VOL. 3 NO. 1 2018


Modeling Volatility in Selected Nigerian Stock Market

Ekum Matthew Iwada & Owolabi Toyin Omoyeni. and Alakija Temitope


Abstract


Modeling the volatility in daily stock prices requires to study the particular error distribution that best fits the data, since it is evident that the stock market is now relied upon by investment analysts, economists and policy makers to measure changes in the general economic activities of a nation and globally. This study, therefore aimed at fitting symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models to daily stock prices of selected securities in Nigeria using Access and Fidelity Banks daily closing share prices from April 1, 2010 to December 16, 2016. This study estimates first order symmetric and asymmetric volatility models each in Normal, Student’s-t and generalized error distributions (GED) with the view to selecting the best forecasting volatility model with the most appropriate error distribution. The results of the analysis shows that PARCH (1, 1), EGARCH (1, 1) and TGARCH in that order with GED were selected to be the best fitted models based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The out-of-sample forecasting evaluation result adjudged PGARCH (1, 1) with GED as the best predictive model based on Mean Absolute Error and Theil Inequality Coefficient and EGARCH(1,1) based on root mean square error (RMSE). It is therefore recommended that empirical workers should consider alternative error distributions while specifying predictive volatility model as less contributing error distributions implies incorrect specification, which could lead to loss of efficiency in the model, especially to model the volatility in stock prices.


keywords:

Asymmetric GARCH; Student’s t distribution; Normal distribution; generalized error distribution; Stock prices


References:


Berkes, I., Horvath, L., and Kokoskza, P. (2003). GARCH processes: Structure and
estimation. Bernoulli, 9:2001–2007, 2003.

Black, F. (1976). Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes. Proceedings of the 1976
Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics
Section, 177-181.

Bollerslev, T. (1986).“Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity.”Journal of
Econometrics, 31:307-327.

Capital Bancorp Nig (2016). Data on Daily All Shares Index.Available at
www.capitalbancorpng.com/research/summary.Accessed on 18th December, 2016.

Dallah, H. and Ade I. (2010).Modelling and Forecasting the Volatility of the Daily Returns of
Nigerian Insurance Stocks. International Business Research 3(2):106-116.

Ding, Z., Granger, C W. J. and Engle, R. F. (1993). A Long Memory Property of Stock
Market Returns and a New Model.Journal of Empirical Finance, 1:83-106.

Engle R. F. (1982): Autogressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with estimates of the
Variance of the United Kingdom inflation, Econometrics 50, 987-1008.

Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D. E. (1993).On the Relation between the
Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks.Journal of
Finance, 48(5):1779-1801.

Jayasuriya, S. (2002). Does Stock Market Libralisation Affect the Volatility of Stock
Returns?: Evidence from Emerging Market Economies. Georgetown University
Discussion Series.

Nelson, D. (1991). “Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach”,
Econometrica, 59(2):347-370.

Nelson, D.B. and C.Q. Cao (1992), “Inequality Constraints in the Univariate GARCH
Model,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 229-235.

Ogum, G. Beer, F and Nouyrigat, G. (2005).Emerging Equity Market Volatility: An
Empirical Investigation of Markets in Kenya and Nigeria.Journal of African Business
6 (1/2):139-154.

Rao, S.S. (2016). A course in Time Series Analysis. Email: suhasini.subbarao@stat.tamu.edu,
November 30, 2016

Taylor, S. (1986), Modelling Financial Time Series, Wiley, Chichester.

Zakoian, J.M. (1994). “Threshold Heteroscedasticity Models”.Journal of Economic
Dynamics and Control, 18:931-955.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back